WOMAN SAYS BATH FITTER RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER DAMAGE
A Putnam County blackamoor has filed a meet against the consort that installed her one-piece bathtub, claiming they unsuccessful to enter the drainpipes, feat liquid alteration and modeling in her residence.
Shirley Young filed the meet Apr 17 in river Circuit Court against Jose LLC and Bath Fitter.
According to the suit, Young was remodeling her room and had a one-piece fiberglass surround grouping and tub installed by Jose, LLC in 2001. Young claims the artefact consort unsuccessful to rank the pipage unification from the tub to the home’s waste system.
According to the suit, pipage liquid assembled in the space beneath Young’s concern until 2007.
“Due to the current proximity of pipage liquid in the crawlspace, modeling and spoiling grew and matured and distribute throughout the plaintiff’s residence,” the meet says. “In addition, the daylong constituent proximity of much liquid caused structural alteration to the plaintiff’s home.”
Young claims she has uninterrupted business restitution in repairing the plumping and cleanup her home, respiratory and unhealthy problems cod to the modeling and spoiling that developed, annoyance, difficulty and expiration of ingest of her bag and expiration of mart value.
Tags: Air, annoyance, bath fitter, Contractor Remodeling, drainpipes, financial damages, inconvenience, plaintiff, putnam county, remodel, remodeling, sewage system, term presence, Wall, water damage